COMPOSABILITY IN CRYPTO: ARE WE MISUNDERSTANDING IT? 🤔 The concept of composability in crypto may have long been misunderstood. When many conclude that "the main Use Case of crypto is only leveraged DeFi deals," the reason lies in how we define composability. Currently, the most common approaches revolve around just two directions: combining protocols (e.g., @Morpho combined with Pendle, Hyperliquid), or inter- chain connectivity, primarily within EVM systems. This perspective inadvertently creates a closed, self-sustaining ecosystem, making it difficult to create or absorb economic value from the real world. 👉 According to @0xfishylosopher, true composability should lie at the on/off-ramp boundary between blockchain and real life. Stablecoins can be likened to a payment "highway," but a highway is only useful when it has access to existing residential areas, businesses, and systems. 🔗 Composability must include: > Ability to integrate with traditional payment standards such as SWIFT, POS, or ISO 20022; > Connecting traditional assets such as Tokenize stocks, RWAs, commodities, and ETFs; > associated with paid software platforms and APIs; > And this also applies to people, real-life events through prediction markets, content verification, or digital identity verification. It is these key points of contact that allow the crypto industry to expand its value pie, instead of remaining stuck in internal PvP battles. What do you think of this perspective?