avatar
Murphy
64,409 Twitter followers
Follow
17年老韭菜;研究链上数据和宏观情绪相结合,构建自己的交易思维。保持谨慎乐观!| 近3亿用户的共同选择就在币安:https://t.co/5pQWuny9gU | #OKX web3入口一个就够 https://t.co/YwY7pIgKzB
Posts
Signal Clone Analysis
avatar
Murphy
Chip Distribution, Rotation Behavior, and My Expectations for 2026 (Long-Read) If we take October 11th as the starting point of this cycle’s downturn, the BTC chip structure has changed dramatically over the past two months. Comparing the URPD data from 10/11 and 12/20, it’s easy to spot that the chips in the red shadow zones are decreasing, while there’s significant accumulation in the middle ranges (partly due to Coinbase wallet consolidation). (Fig 1) (Fig 2) But this only gives a rough picture. For better clarity, I pulled the full URPD dataset, made a table with $10k increments, and calculated chip accumulation and distribution from 10/11 to 12/20. This helps us observe current price distribution and rotation behavior. (Fig 3) 🚩 Key observations and summary from the table above: 1. The largest BTC stack is in the $80k–$90k range, totaling 2.536 million BTC, up 1.874 million since 10/11. This means the $80k–$90k range has been the strongest support since 10/11. Next is $90k–$100k (+324k BTC) and $100k–$110k (+87k BTC). 2. At the current BTC price, there are 6.168 million coins in loss above price, and 7.462 million in profit below. Excluding Satoshi’s and lost coins, BTC is almost at a chip structure equilibrium. If you see the two large ranges as a “dual-anchor structure,” BTC is close to the middle. 3. From 10/11–12/20, profit-taking chips below have dropped by 1.33 million, while loss chips above $110k have dropped by 902k. Notably, chips in the $100k–$110k range didn’t decrease, but increased by 87k. So, the top weak hands have mostly been shaken out in this drop—what’s left is mostly “diamond hands.” 4. The main contradiction now is heavy profit-taking. Whether it’s the 4-year cycle, macro uncertainty, quantum threats or other FUD, LTHs (long-term holders) are doing a massive distribution, with plenty of inventory left. The $60k–$70k range holds the most and is being dumped the hardest. These are largely chips accumulated pre-2024 US election, now rushing to cash out as profits shrink. 5. The $70k–$80k range is a “dead zone” with only 190k BTC. This means almost nobody is holding BTC at these prices. So if BTC dumps into this zone, it’ll likely attract huge liquidity and get support – that’s the logic behind the “dual-anchor structure,” validated many times before. --------------------------------------------- 🚩 2026 Outlook and Trading Thoughts Looking at chip rotation and structure, the panic sellers at the top (cost basis above $110k) are basically exhausted. Unless price nukes further and shakes out another 1.87 million chips in the $80k–$90k range, the focus is now on how much profit-chasing supply below will sell. Another angle: despite massive “old coin” profit-taking, BTC hasn’t crashed 50%+ like in previous cycles. This means the market has real absorption power. When price becomes attractive, demand steps in, and structurally, you see layer-by-layer defense. So this looks more like a brutal “shakeout phase” (with future BTC dominance changing hands), not a full-blown cycle reset. When BTC broke below the MVRV extreme deviation lower bound ($121k), I took profit on everything. Once the Investor Confidence Index hit the red zone ($102k), I started to DCA in, using a positive pyramid strategy—buying in the $90k–$98k and $80k–$89k zones, with the largest buy order at $80k (which missed by just $600 on 11/21). My average entry is just above $90k, with about 60% spot exposure. On spot, I’m in a floating loss, but the drawdown isn’t severe. Also, in early November, seeing chip concentration too high, I hedged some risk with long volatility. Overall, still in profit. My view: 2026 will bring a major inflection point, earlier than most expect. I don’t think Q4 2026 will be the cycle bottom—it’ll come sooner. From the chip structure, $70k–$80k and $60k–$70k are both strong support zones. The former is the dual-anchor effect, the latter has 1.2 million chips stacked, even after a big distribution. So, even if 2026 is bearish, I expect a bottom somewhere in these two ranges—more likely $70k–$80k than $60k–$70k. Some might think I’m too optimistic, and yeah—I’m always cautiously bullish. But I’m not all-in on BTC hitting or breaking these levels—I’m just prepared. If price gets there, I buy as planned. If not, I wait for the right-side setup. Sure, there’s opportunity and time cost, but that’s not my main worry. I focus on probability (no one buys the absolute bottom or sells the top)—trading time for upside. I believe, once BTC hits $70k, lots of sidelined capital will ape in. If you believe next bull BTC hits $150k, buying here is a clear double. $150,000—It’s not that far off. Whether you believe or not, I’m betting on the reversal. If something unexpected blows up my risk exposure, I’ll hedge as needed. My confidence comes from healthy cashflow—not everyone can copy this, so DYOR. All the data and logic behind “MVRV extreme deviation zone,” “Investor Confidence Index,” and “Chip Concentration” are explained in my past threads. I never delete any thread, even if I’m wrong. If you’re curious, go dig them up yourself—I’m too lazy to link. Not many people read long threads in this market, but I wrote it anyway. I hope by the end of 2026, looking back at these thoughts and expectations will be fun—let’s see how much was right, how much was off. Thanks for reading this far—wishing all of us good fortune in 2026! ---------------------------------------------- Bitget VIP: Lower Fees, Bigger Perks, Next-Level Alpha.
BTC
2.47%
avatar
Murphy
Here’s an interesting observation lately: The biggest concern among the Chinese crypto community right now is whether BTC will repeat 2022 and plunge into another deep bear cycle. Meanwhile, the English-speaking crowd seems to be on a “higher level” of paranoia—they’re worried about quantum attacks that could totally wreck BTC’s underlying cryptography. Is this why so many low-cap bag holders have been dumping and cashing out lately? Seriously, can you handle this FUD? Here’s my take: if this isn’t some coordinated fear-mongering from vested interests, then it’s just pure overthinking. Sure, quantum computing is one of the most sci-fi and potentially serious threats out there, since in theory it could break ECDSA public key encryption (meaning exposed private keys). But! In reality, we’re still at least 10-20 years (probably more) away from a practical quantum computer that could actually crack 256-bit elliptic curve cryptography. Current quantum tech is still struggling with stability, error correction, and a ton of other issues. And let’s be real—if/when quantum breakthrough actually happens, the whole internet financial system (RSA, ECC, you name it) goes down before BTC does. The Bitcoin community would have plenty of time to react, and with its decentralized governance, it’s way more upgradeable than most TradFi systems. Honestly, you should be more worried about your money vanishing from your bank than from BTC. Clearly, quantum attacks are not a real threat in the short term. When/if it happens, sure, some lost early BTC might get “resurrected” and re-enter circulation, but that’s more like a one-off supply shock—bringing the circulating supply back to 21M. The market will price this in and move on. Since its birth in 2009, BTC has been declared “dead” countless times. Ponzi schemes, scams, government bans, scaling wars, energy FUD—you name it. Now, with “quantum computing threats” being hyped as the latest mainstream FUD, we’ve basically hit the ceiling. What’s left? There aren’t many more “higher level” reasons to FUD BTC anymore. If all these OGs are really dumping just because of this, I’m actually even more bullish. Every time FUD escalates to “existential technical collapse” levels (think the 2018 “scaling death spiral” or 2022’s “energy FUD + FTX meltdown”), it’s usually right before the next bull run. Quantum FUD is now the hot topic in the English community, which probably means we’re at peak fear for this supercycle. Next up: greed takes over. Sponsored by @Bitget| Bitget VIP: lower fees, bigger perks.
BTC
2.47%
avatar
Murphy
12-20
When will bulls be willing to pay a premium again, and can BTC break out of its negative feedback loop? The directional premium of perpetual contracts measures the total daily funding fees paid by longs to shorts across all exchanges. By adding the 30-day moving average and 90-day standard deviation as benchmarks, we can gauge how concentrated leveraged long positions are and how strong the willingness to pay is—in other words, the intensity of bullish sentiment. As discussed in our previous article “Why Is ETF Buying Power Fading?”, when bullish sentiment, risk appetite, and leverage all decline together, we enter a negative feedback loop. To break out, the first step is for bullish willingness to recover. Related article: x.com/Murphychen888/status/200...… (Figure 1) Looking at previous cases (red shaded areas in the chart), whenever the “premium paid by longs (green line)” drops below the “90-day -1 standard deviation (red line),” market sentiment is extremely bearish. As macro factors shift and confidence gradually returns, the premium paid by longs rises above the 30-day moving average (purple line)—clear proof that sentiment is shifting from extreme fear to cautious optimism. This helps the market escape the “death spiral,” reducing the probability of another sharp, deep drop in the short term. So, seeing the green line climb from below the red line to above the purple line is a positive sign. It shows the market has moved from a consensus that BTC would repeat the deep bear of 2022, to at least some participants expressing disagreement through actual trading. This divergence brings “uncertainty” for 2026—meaning the script for a four-year cycle from bull to bear may not play out exactly as before. At the very least, there’s still room for debate. (Figure 2) Comparing the data from Feb-Apr 2022 (Figure 2)—a stretch many refer to—we can clearly see the difference: back then, the premium paid by longs stayed below both the 30-day MA and 90-day standard deviation, signaling extreme bearishness. Even during rebounds, no one wanted to go long and there was no divergence. Now, with most major macro events for December already priced in, the biggest thing to watch is the massive options expiry on Dec 26. Once market makers unwind their hedges, how will the new capital structure affect price action? If the transition is smooth, the setup looks favorable for January—at the very least, it won’t be one-sided. From a position structure perspective, once low-entry profit-takers have finished selling, emotional recovery could trigger passive locking for high-entry bagholders, giving the market a shot at a real turnaround! ---------------------------------------------- Sponsored by @Bitget Bitget VIP: Lower fees, bigger perks twitter.com/Murphychen888/stat...
BTC
2.47%
avatar
Murphy
12-19
Emotions racing against time: BTC is at the tipping point of a structural overhaul. There’s a line in the latest Glassnode report that really resonates with me — “Time has now become the primary source of market pressure.” Currently, the amount of BTC in loss has climbed to 6.7 million coins (7d SMA), marking a new high for this cycle. As time drags on and these holders become increasingly frustrated, bearish sentiment is only going to get louder. Back on December 3rd, I shared a three-part thread analyzing a key idea: There are two critical triggers for “entering a deep bear” — price and time. Any BTC that changed hands after June 30th of this year is now considered short-term holder (STH) coins at a loss. If we project forward, these STH coins with a cost basis between $107,000 and $125,000 will automatically become long-term holder (LTH) coins after three months, i.e., Q1 2026. This could significantly shift LTHs’ price sensitivity. (Figure 1) Right now, we’re seeing LTH price sensitivity (blue line) rapidly catching up to STH price sensitivity (red line). Since LTHs control more supply, if they start reacting more sharply to price moves, the risk of panic selling and a deeper bear market rises significantly (see referenced analysis for details). A few days ago, we discussed how, before the massive options expiry on December 26, market makers sitting on long gamma positions are providing support at the lower price bound — so major swings are unlikely. But after December 26, as hedges are unwound and market structure shifts, that previous support could temporarily disappear. New support levels will depend on the post-expiry capital structure, which is collectively decided by all market participants (not just a single KOL or institution’s prediction). If the market expects a breakdown below a certain level, and capital moves its defense lower, odds are we’ll see that breakdown. Spot bid walls can get pulled, shorts pile in, options market makers flip to short gamma — you know the drill. At the end of the day, it’s all about the power of sentiment, transmitted into action and embraced by the crowd, ultimately flipping the trend and the price. (Figure 2) Current data shows BTC in loss held by STHs is 15.29%, LTHs at 11.76%; while STHs still hold more, LTHs are closing the gap, and if they overtake, it’ll be a major stress test for the market. I’ve marked two historical cases on Figure 2 where LTH loss supply surpassed STH — check it out for yourself, the implication is clear. (Figure 3) The good news: LTHs still seem able to stay calm and disciplined. Data from Figure 3 shows that throughout December’s dips, it was STHs who dominated the loss selling. On December 18, for example, STHs accounted for 67.82% of realized losses, while LTHs were just 11.88%. The question is, if more LTH coins go underwater, can they maintain that same composure? One thing we can’t ignore: In this cycle, the profile of LTHs has fundamentally changed. With so many traditional institutions involved, BTC is increasingly being treated as a long-term (cross-cycle) reserve asset, not just a short-term price speculation. Either way, Q1 2026 is shaping up to be a season of major uncertainty. Emotions are racing against time! If macro policy and liquidity expectations turn more dovish, market confidence could recover, and trapped coins at higher prices could become “passively locked” — supporting the market. Otherwise, we could see a deeper price flush ahead. ---------------------------------------------- Sponsored by @Bitget| Bitget VIP — lower fees, bigger perks twitter.com/Murphychen888/stat...
GAMMA
0%
avatar
Murphy
12-19
Thread
This indicator is quite interesting! However, the sample size is relatively small (only 5 times), making it prone to overfitting; if bear market oversold conditions were included, the trajectory might be different. Of course, its premise is that the traditional 4-year cycle has been broken. Just like our "three-line convergence," the sample size is even smaller (only 3 times), so I categorize it as a mystical indicator 😂. ------------------------------------------ The author's view: He believes that BTC is currently in a typical "oversold" phase (RSI indicator has fallen below 30), and has drawn an "average recovery path" for BTC prices based on historical data (several similar situations in the past). The current price movement almost perfectly matches this historical average trajectory: starting from the oversold point, it first consolidates at the bottom (chop), and then gradually rebounds upwards. He emphasizes that the traditional "4-year cycle" is not actually driven by halvings, but by the public debt refinancing cycle. This cycle was delayed by a year after COVID, and now, due to the extended debt maturity structure, the 4-year cycle has "officially died." Based on his macroeconomic analysis (business cycle, financial conditions, global liquidity expectations), this bull market is likely to continue until 2026, rather than ending soon. Because a large amount of global interest payments still need to be addressed through monetization (printing money), far exceeding GDP growth, this will drive more liquidity into the market, supporting the rise of risky assets (such as Bitcoin). However, bottoming out takes time and will involve a lot of volatility. If the bull market hasn't ended, this trajectory chart will still be valuable for reference. ------------------------------------------ The Indicator's Principle The indicator he shared is based on the "oversold recovery trajectory" model of the Relative Strength Index (RSI). He selected several historical events where Bitcoin's RSI fell below 30 (extremely oversold) (the post mentions only 5 times, all during bull markets), then aligned these events (t=0 being the moment the RSI fell below 30), calculated the average percentage change in BTC price from that day, and plotted a "composite average trajectory line." The current BTC price movement closely matches this historical average line, so he believes it may continue to follow this pattern: bottoming out and then moving upwards. This is a historical composite analysis, similar to the average performance statistics of specific events in the stock market (such as the stock market performance after a Fed rate cut). It doesn't predict precise prices, but rather provides a probabilistic reference: historically, after similar oversold conditions, prices often recover in this way. However, the author also acknowledges that the indicator is not perfect (the sample only includes 5 instances, all within an upward cycle), and it won't match every instance exactly, but it's still a useful reference tool. twitter.com/Murphychen888/stat...
BTC
2.47%
avatar
Murphy
12-16
Market sentiment shifts on BTC downside risk pricing In the options market, buying puts is how investors pay for insurance against potential downside risk. So, when put premiums drop sharply with little change in price structure, it often signals that panic over a “fast, short-term dump” is easing. Check out the chart below: On Nov 24, total put buying ≈ $60.78M (7d-SMA); On Dec 14, put buying ≈ $15.65M. That’s a massive drop, showing traders are way less willing to pay for short-term downside protection than they were at the end of November. But this doesn’t mean bearish sentiment is gone – more likely, hedging strategies have shifted. As BTC bounced after testing the $80K level, price acceptance built up below, volatility dropped, and paying fat premiums for puts became less attractive. So, traders either stopped buying or cut back on puts. The real signal for “has the market repriced BTC downside risk?” isn’t just how many puts are bought, but whether people are now willing to SELL puts. This is where Chart 2 gets interesting: In the last 24 hours, we’ve seen heavy put selling at $85,000 strike, meaning traders are actively betting against BTC dropping below $85K. In trader-speak: As long as BTC settles above $85K at expiry, sellers pocket $4.33M in premiums risk-free. In other words, big money is betting $85K is a solid support level, even if it gets tested. Looking at expiry dates and net premium flows: - Dec 19 expiry: Most put buying is at $80K, showing concern BTC could drop below that, especially with the BOJ rate hike landing that day. - Dec 26 expiry: Bigger put selling at $85K, suggesting the market expects BTC to hold above $85K by then. TL;DR: 1. End-November panic showed up as heavy put buying to price in tail risk. 2. As BTC rebounded and volatility cooled, demand for put protection dropped sharply. 3. Major put selling at $85K shows traders are re-pricing BTC’s downside risk. — Sponsored by @Bitget| Bitget VIP: Lower fees, wilder rewards twitter.com/Murphychen888/stat...
BTC
2.47%
loading indicator
Loading..