As the 2024 US presidential election approaches, the tension in the capital market has reached a critical point, and the cryptocurrency market is even more nerve-wracking. This year, the high-profile campaign of Trump, who has gone through life-and-death crises, has ignited the enthusiasm of the cryptocurrency circle with the slogan "Making America the Crypto Capital". However, history repeatedly reminds us that subtle changes in policies often become the watershed of the market.
Reviewing the "New Deal" after Roosevelt took office in 1933, the economic rules of the United States were completely reshaped overnight, and a large number of companies were forced to adapt to the new policy direction, and the market pattern was reshuffled and reorganized. And this time, the cryptocurrency industry may be facing the same fate. With Harris' steady progress in the campaign, her and Biden's highly consistent policy positions mean that the current government's anti-cryptocurrency regulation may continue to be intensified. For a cryptocurrency market that advocates freedom and decentralization, this policy direction may be a real life-and-death test.
So, if Harris is elected, what will the future of cryptocurrencies be like? What potential opportunities that cannot be ignored may be brewing in it? We will delve into these questions.
According to the forecast website Polymarket, the probability of Trump's victory is currently 62.5%, while Harris' chance of winning is only 37.5%. Although the prediction market believes that Trump's winning rate is higher, Forbes' poll on October 31 shows that Harris is leading Trump by a slim margin of 1% nationwide, and 10% of voters may change their stance before the election.
In the seven key swing states that will decide the election, Harris has a 49% support rate, slightly ahead of Trump's 48%. And just a week ago, Trump was leading Harris 50% to 46% in these states.
Therefore, although many cryptocurrency supporters are more optimistic about Trump's election, Harris still has the possibility of succeeding.
The "Comeback" Presidents Who Were Not Favored But Eventually Surpassed
There have been several occasions in US history where candidates who were not favored in the early stages of the campaign, or even underestimated by poll data, ultimately managed to pull off a successful comeback.
· In 1948, Truman was one of them. Polls showed he was trailing the Republican candidate Thomas Dewey. The media and polling agencies even prematurely announced Dewey's victory, and some newspapers even printed headlines declaring "Dewey Defeats Truman". However, Truman launched a series of intensive campaign activities, directly addressing voters and emphasizing the Democratic Party's achievements in economic and social policies, ultimately winning the election. This election was considered a classic case of poll inaccuracy.
· In 1992, Clinton was also not the frontrunner in the Democratic primary, and faced a slump in the early stages of the campaign due to a series of negative reports and scandals, with many experts predicting he would have difficulty making it to the end. But due to his flexible campaign strategy, ability to communicate with the public, and the economic difficulties at the time, he gradually gained support. He eventually defeated the incumbent President George H.W. Bush and third-party candidate Ross Perot in a three-way race to win the election.
· In 2016, Trump himself also staged a major comeback. Trump was seen as a "hopeless" candidate not only in the Republican primary, but was also severely underestimated by mainstream polls in the final election against Hillary Clinton. During the campaign, Trump, relying on his strong populist style and appeal to the American middle and lower classes, gained the support of a large number of voters, especially with his outstanding performance in the swing states, ultimately winning the election.
From this, we can see that it is unwise to draw conclusions before the actual voting results are revealed. Just as Bitcoin faced a black swan event at the height of its bull run, no one can predict the final outcome of the election in advance.
Harris Elected: Disaster or Market Adjustment? Polarized Market Opinions
First, we have to admit that if Harris is elected, there is a high probability that she will continue the policy direction of the Biden era. At this moment, the hearts of cryptocurrency investors are like riding a roller coaster.
Analysts at the renowned Bernstein firm have already predicted that if Harris wins, Bitcoin's price could see a significant decline by the end of the year, possibly even dropping by 10%.
On the other hand, the veteran cryptocurrency trader Crypto Rand is much more calm. He believes that regardless of who occupies the White House, the overall direction of the cryptocurrency market will not change, and the bull market will eventually arrive, only that the road may be a bit bumpy.
So, there are two key points here: first, Biden-style policies are unfriendly to cryptocurrencies, and second, the market is guessing whether Harris will intensify regulation, thereby causing greater uncertainty.
Crypto Rand said that even so, Bitcoin could rebound and bottom out in 2025, driving the entire market towards a new bull market. These predictions are not unfounded, as the dramatic ups and downs of the cryptocurrency market, whether Bitcoin or Altcoins, have already become the norm. And for some staunch supporters, this is just short-term volatility and does not represent a reversal of the overall trend.
Continuation of Regulatory Policies: Gary Gensler's "Enforcement Regulation" and the Biden Administration's Regulatory Approach
We need to deeply understand how the Biden administration has treated cryptocurrencies in order to more accurately predict Harris' policy direction. Since Biden took office, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under the leadership of Chairman Gary Gensler, has launched an "enforcement regulation" mode, especially targeting the cryptocurrency industry, which can be described as uncompromising. The SEC not only sued large exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, but also thoroughly investigated unregistered cryptocurrency securities. Both within and outside the market, it is widely believed that Gensler's regulatory approach has obvious high-pressure characteristics, and he has become the "guardian of order" in the cryptocurrency market with his own efforts, but his methods have also sparked a lot of controversy, with some even accusing him of being a "disruptor" of the market.
The following is a review of some regulatory bills and enforcement actions from the beginning of 2021 to the end of Biden's term in 2024, in chronological order:
2021
· March: The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the US Treasury Department proposed a proposal to strengthen anti-money laundering (AML) and "know your customer" (KYC) requirements for cryptocurrencies, aimed at curbing the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities.
· August: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a lawsuit against the cryptocurrency trading platform BitMEX, accusing it of failing to implement proper AML and KYC measures. Eventually, BitMEX agreed to pay a $100 million fine and settle with the CFTC.
2022
· February: The SEC filed a lawsuit against the cryptocurrency lending platform BlockFi, accusing it of failing to register its yield account products as securities. Eventually, BlockFi agreed to pay a $100 million fine.
· March: President Biden signed an executive order on digital assets, requiring federal agencies to coordinate the development of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, aimed at protecting consumers, maintaining financial stability, combating illegal activities, and exploring the possibility of a US central bank digital currency (CBDC).
· June: The US Department of Justice established a National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, and the department immediately intervened in multiple cases after its establishment, including tracking the cryptocurrency assets of the illegal "Silk Road" trading platform, and assisting in tracing international illegal cryptocurrency asset transfers.
· September: The US Treasury Department released three reports on digital assets, focusing on the risks of cryptocurrencies in illegal finance, consumer protection, and payment systems, further clarifying the government's regulatory stance on cryptocurrencies.
· October: The SEC began investigating the NFT project Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) under the Yuga Labs brand, concerned that its tokens may involve unregistered securities sales.
· December: After the FTX bankruptcy, the CFTC, SEC, and Department of Justice launched a joint investigation into FTX to determine if there was any misuse of customer funds, misappropriation, and fraudulent behavior.
2023
· May: Bipartisan members of the U.S. Congress introduced the "Cryptocurrency Tax Fairness Act," proposing to implement capital gains tax exemptions for small transactions to promote the everyday use of cryptocurrencies and ensure the industry is not suppressed by a complex tax system.
· August: The SEC filed lawsuits against the major Altcoin exchange Binance and Coinbase, alleging they were not registered as securities exchanges, and that certain digital assets were considered unregistered securities. This action by the SEC was seen as a comprehensive cleanup of the Altcoin market, imposing stricter compliance requirements on trading platforms that do not comply with securities laws.
· September: The Biden administration expressed an interest in further examining all Proof-of-Stake (PoS) cryptocurrencies, intending to define them as securities. The SEC began to intensify its regulation of PoS assets like Ethereum, stating that their voting rights structure is similar to traditional stocks, potentially requiring compliance with securities laws.
· November: Binance agreed to pay a $4.3 billion fine to settle the U.S. government's multi-year investigation into the company. Binance admitted to involvement in alleged money laundering, unlicensed money transmission, and sanctions violations. Additionally, founder CZ acknowledged the failure to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and stepped down as CEO.
2024
· April: CZ was sentenced to four months in prison by a U.S. federal court in Seattle for violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws (he has since been released).
· May: The U.S. House of Representatives passed the "21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act" (FIT21), establishing a legal foundation for the regulation of digital assets and further clarifying the regulatory responsibilities of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), especially in the management and oversight of Altcoins and digital financial products. The FIT21 Act is seen as an important foundational step for a federal digital asset regulatory framework.
· June: The U.S. Treasury Department issued a final rule requiring all Altcoin platforms to report user transaction details to the IRS starting in 2026, aiming to tighten the tax regulation of Altcoins and reduce tax evasion.
These events and legislation undoubtedly indicate that the Biden administration's overall attitude towards Altcoins is leaning towards stricter regulation. Under the leadership of Gary Gensler, the SEC has adopted an "enforcement-based regulatory" approach, bringing the Altcoin industry into a more stringent legal framework and requiring market participants to comply with regulatory standards.
It is worth noting that the future role of Gary Gensler is currently uncertain. Although Trump had promised to fire Gensler on "day one" if elected, he legally cannot directly decide the SEC chairman's tenure. And Harris has not yet made a formal statement on Gensler's reappointment, with market analysts generally believing that Gensler's "enforcement-based regulatory" strategy may face resistance.
Well-known Altcoin analyst Crypto Rand bluntly stated that Gensler's policies are "the biggest burden on the U.S. Altcoin industry."
Rashan Colbert, the policy manager of the decentralized exchange platform dYdX, also pointed out that if the new administration can replace the SEC chairman, it will mark the end of overreach in enforcement and harmful regulation, which may help the Altcoin market develop in compliance.
Billionaire investor Mark Cuban also expressed doubts about Gensler's enforcement approach, believing that Harris' team is inclined to oppose the "enforcement-based regulatory" model and hopes to promote the development of the Altcoin market through a clear regulatory framework.
Cuban pointed out that Harris "prefers clear regulatory rules rather than relying on litigation," a approach that can allow companies to develop applications without having to move overseas.
Other industry observers believe that even if Harris replaces Gensler, the enforcement intensity in the Altcoin market will not weaken. Venture capitalist Tim Draper went further, calling for a complete overhaul of U.S. securities laws, pointing out that the current Howey rule was established 80 years ago and cannot adapt to the "dynamic and constantly growing modern market environment." The real turning point lies in whether the industry can reduce uncertainty through more transparent and clear regulations. This is of great concern in the market, as a clear regulatory framework can help companies and investors make more stable arrangements, rather than feeling like they are walking a tightrope with each policy release.
Global Liquidity and Market Opportunities: Will Loose Monetary Policy Become the Bull Market Driver?
Yang Youwei, chief economist at Bit Mining, pointed out that if Harris is elected, Altcoin investors should pay special attention to global economic liquidity.
The key point here is: Will the so-called "hot money" flow back into the Altcoin market, becoming a catalyst for a new bull market? Yang Youwei's view is clear: the more accommodative the monetary policy, the greater the possibility of capital inflows into the Altcoin market. Given the current uncertainty in the global economy and the generally loose policies adopted by central banks around the world, the influx of hot money could indeed bring more market opportunities.
Altcoin entrepreneur Erik Finman also supports this view. He believes that if the Federal Reserve adopts a more accommodative stance under Harris' leadership, then even with regulatory challenges, the increase in market liquidity will still provide support for prices. In other words, the further Harris' policies go down the "loose monetary" path, the greater the bull market potential for the Altcoin market.
However, all of this is premised on whether the U.S. can withstand greater inflationary pressures. It can be foreseen that if Harris tries to continue the loose policy, it will inevitably face considerable fiscal pressure and market resistance. In this case, companies and investors must be alert to the volatility risks in the Altcoin market and not easily ignore the chain reactions caused by monetary policy.
Lack of Clear Policy Causing Panic: Will the U.S. Altcoin Industry Be "Geographically Fenced"?
For many Altcoin market participants, a major flaw of Harris is her ambiguous attitude towards Altcoins. In September this year, Harris only publicly stated for the first time that her government will encourage investment in artificial intelligence and digital assets to maintain U.S. competitiveness. However, it is obvious that such a statement lacks details and cannot reassure the market. This ambiguity has led many to worry that she may continue Biden's tough line, further increasing market uncertainty.
Venture capitalist Tim Draper pointed out bluntly that "fear" has already begun to spread in the industry, especially for smaller Altcoin companies that are more sensitive to uncertainty. Rather than wavering on U.S. regulatory policies, more and more companies are choosing to go overseas directly, seeking a more clear policy environment. Currently, countries like Dubai and Singapore have more relaxed and transparent policies than the U.S., and the "geographic fencing" phenomenon is emerging in the U.S.
Colbert, the policy manager of the well-known decentralized platform dYdX, further supplemented: "Other countries are moving faster than the U.S. If the new U.S. government is unwilling to maintain competitiveness in the Altcoin field, this trend will continue." Even if the Harris government relaxes policies in some areas in the future, without systematicity and clarity, it will inevitably push innovators towards more inclusive markets.
The "2024 Henley Crypto Adoption Index" published by the investment migration consultancy Henley & Partners ranked the U.S. behind the UAE, Hong Kong, and Singapore in terms of Altcoin adoption.
Nevertheless, most major Altcoin companies have not yet left the U.S. Although the regulatory authorities have not been very friendly in the past few years, the U.S. market is simply too tempting, and many Altcoin companies cannot leave.
If Harris is elected president, the market will clearly need clear and strong policy signals to stabilize investor confidence. The current chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has sparked widespread controversy with his tough regulatory approach, and the market generally expects that Harris may appoint new leaders after taking office, which could alleviate industry discontent.
But the real challenge is whether the Harris administration can find the ideal balance - to protect the basic security of the market while promoting the prosperity of the industry. Under a more accommodative monetary policy, if a stable policy environment can be provided, the potential of the cryptocurrency market will undoubtedly be unleashed.
Dogecoin and the "Shill King" Musk in the Crypto Market Volatility
In the turbulent world of cryptocurrencies, Dogecoin has always been an "outsider". Unlike mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, Dogecoin not only has high volatility, but also has a mocking and self-deprecating quality. Who would have thought that this cryptocurrency, which was originally a joke, would have sparked a global frenzy under Musk's drive. And this "Shill King" Musk has long become the spokesperson for Dogecoin, whether it's his personal tweets or Tesla's cash flow management, he has frequently brought Dogecoin into the mainstream view, and has used his personal influence to open up a major road for this niche project.
So the question is: if Trump wins the 2024 U.S. election, and Musk "takes over" to be in charge of the so-called "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), the Dogecoin market will undoubtedly be more lively. But if Trump loses and Harris is elected, what then?
Harris' policy stance has always been ambiguous, which is not good news for the cryptocurrency market, especially for the highly emotional Dogecoin investors.
Crypto analyst Crypto Rand predicts that if Harris is elected, a panic sentiment may quickly spread in the market. Since Dogecoin investors are often more inclined to be driven by short-term emotions, once the policy is unclear, the market may enter a short-term sell-off mode. That is to say, the price of Dogecoin may experience a "free fall", and if this panic sentiment is not dissipated in time, it will lead to deeper market volatility.
Musk: Siding with Trump and His "Puppet Theory" of Harris
Speaking of which, Musk's own performance in this election has also been very eye-catching. As the "Shill King" who dares to speak and act in the tech circle, he clearly sided with Trump this year, even spending millions of dollars to support his campaign. Through a high-stakes lottery, he intends to drive more voters to participate in the election, especially in the key states where the election is deadlocked. This Tesla CEO not only uses his own social media influence to call out, but also directly supports the campaign through a political action committee (PAC), sparing no effort to stand on Trump's side.
More topically, Musk's view of Harris. In public, Musk has bluntly called Harris a "puppet" and said that Harris does not have real decision-making power. In his remarks, Harris is seen as a "front-stage puppet" - a political tool person who lacks substantive decision-making power. Musk's all-out support for Trump as one of America's top billionaires is extremely rare in American history, so Musk can't help but have that "heart-to-heart" - if Trump fails this time, I may be arrested and lose everything.
The "Emotional Panic" and Future Risks of the Dogecoin Market
Compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum, the market structure of Dogecoin is more dependent on emotion-driven, and once investor confidence is unstable, it is easy to form a large-scale sell-off wave. In the past, under Musk's support, the price of Dogecoin often fluctuates rapidly in a short period of time, but if Harris takes office and the policy is unclear, whether Musk's influence can be maintained remains to be seen.
Especially in the context of Tesla's improving financial performance in the third quarter and its unchanged Bitcoin holdings, whether Musk's enthusiasm for Dogecoin will be affected by the political situation has also become a focus of market attention.
If Trump loses, the political pressure Musk faces will rise sharply, and his personal activity in the cryptocurrency market may be greatly weakened. This is obviously not good news for Dogecoin. After all, Musk's support is an important reason for Dogecoin to frequently appear in the public eye, and once his shill effect fades, the price of Dogecoin may enter a period of emotion-driven volatility, and even face further downside risks.
Conclusion: Unclear Policies + Market Turmoil, Dogecoin Needs to Beware of "Double Blow"
In summary, the unclear policy after Harris' election, the risk factor of Musk siding with Trump, and the instability of investor sentiment, all make the future of Dogecoin uncertain. The future of Dogecoin may be pulled between Harris' policy tone and Musk's personal influence. For investors, especially short-term speculators, they must be wary of changes in market sentiment and not blindly chase the trend or panic sell, so as not to fall into unnecessary risks.
In short, this 2024 election will not only determine the future pattern of the U.S. political landscape, but may also become a watershed in the fate of Dogecoin and Musk.
Future Outlook: If Harris Is Elected President, Will She Reshape the Crypto Market Landscape?
Currently, there are only four days left until the U.S. election day, and regardless of who occupies the White House, the volatility in the crypto market is likely to be inevitable. In the short term, strict policy control or the boon of monetary easing will only be a peak or trough in the market waves; in the long run, the direction of the crypto market will not change due to this, but the road will be more tortuous and unpredictable.
As for where the cryptocurrency will go in the future, perhaps only God knows.
Welcome to join the official community of BlockBeats:
Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Twitter Official Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia
