Editor's Note: This article focuses on discussing various technologies that enhance privacy and security, including zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP), trusted execution environments (TEE), and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), and introduces their applications in AI and data processing to protect user privacy, prevent data leaks, and improve system security. The article also mentions some cases such as Earnifi, Opacity, and MindV, demonstrating how these technologies can be used to achieve risk-free voting and encrypted data processing, but these technologies also face many challenges such as computational overhead and latency issues.
The following is the original content (the original content has been edited for easier reading):
As the demand for data has surged, the digital footprint left by individuals has become increasingly widespread, making personal information more susceptible to abuse or unauthorized access. We have already seen some cases of personal data breaches, such as the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Those who haven't caught up yet can check out the first part of the series, where we discussed:
· The importance of data
· The growing demand for data in artificial intelligence
· The emergence of the data layer
GDPR in Europe, CCPA in California, and regulations in other parts of the world have made data privacy not just an ethical issue, but a legal requirement, driving companies to ensure data protection.
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, AI has further complicated the areas of privacy and verifiability while also enhancing privacy protection. For example, while AI can help detect fraudulent activities, it also enables "deep fakes" technology, making it more difficult to verify the authenticity of digital content.
Advantages
· Privacy-preserving machine learning: Federated learning allows AI models to be trained directly on devices without the need to centralize sensitive data, thus protecting user privacy.
· AI can be used to anonymize or pseudonymize data, making it less traceable to individuals while still usable for analysis.
· AI is crucial for developing tools to detect and mitigate the spread of deep fakes, ensuring the verifiability of digital content (as well as the authenticity of AI agents).
· AI can automatically ensure data processing practices comply with legal standards, making the verification process more scalable.
Challenges
· AI systems often require large datasets to operate effectively, but the use, storage, and access of data may be opaque, raising privacy concerns.
· With sufficient data and advanced AI techniques, individuals may be re-identified from supposedly anonymous datasets, undermining privacy protection.
· As AI can generate highly realistic text, images, or videos, it becomes more difficult to distinguish real content from AI-generated fakes, challenging verifiability.
· AI models can be fooled or manipulated (adversarial attacks), compromising the verifiability of data or the integrity of the AI systems themselves (as seen in cases like Freysa and Jailbreak).
These challenges have driven the rapid development of AI, blockchain, verifiability, and privacy technologies, leveraging the strengths of each. We have seen the rise of the following technologies:
· Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP)
· Zero-knowledge transport layer security (zkTLS)
· Trusted execution environments (TEE)
· Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE)
1. Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP)
ZKP allows one party to prove to another party that they know certain information or that a statement is true, without revealing any information beyond the proof itself. AI can leverage this to prove that data processing or decision-making complies with certain standards without revealing the data itself. A good case study is getgrass.io, where Grass uses idle internet bandwidth to collect and organize public web data for training AI models.
The Grass Network allows users to contribute their idle internet bandwidth through a browser extension or app, which is used to crawl public web data and then process it into structured datasets suitable for AI training. The network executes this web crawling process through nodes run by users.
The Grass Network emphasizes user privacy, only crawling public data and not personal information. It uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify and protect the integrity and provenance of the data, preventing data corruption and ensuring transparency. All data collection-to-processing transactions are managed through a sovereign data aggregator on the Solana blockchain.
Another good case study is zkMe.
zkMe's zkKYC solution addresses the challenge of conducting KYC (Know Your Customer) processes in a privacy-preserving manner. By leveraging zero-knowledge proofs, zkKYC enables platforms to verify user identities without exposing sensitive personal information, maintaining compliance while protecting user privacy.
2. zkTLS
TLS = standard security protocol, providing privacy and data integrity between two communicating applications (often related to the "s" in HTTPS). zk + TLS = enhancing privacy and security in data transmission.
A good case study is OpacityNetwork.
Opacity uses zkTLS to provide secure and private data storage solutions, ensuring confidentiality and tamper-resistance in data transmission between users and the storage server, addressing the inherent privacy issues in traditional cloud storage services.
Use case - Earned Wage Access: Earnifi, reportedly a top-ranking financial app, has leveraged OpacityNetwork's zkTLS.
· Privacy: Users can provide lenders or other services with their income or employment status without revealing sensitive banking information or personal details like bank statements.
· Security: The use of zkTLS ensures these transactions are secure, verified, and kept private. It avoids users having to entrust their full financial data to a third party.
· Efficiency: The system reduces the costs and complexities associated with traditional earned wage access platforms, which may require cumbersome verification processes or data sharing.
3. TEE
Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) provide hardware-enforced isolation between a normal execution environment and a secure execution environment. This may be the most prominent security implementation in AI agents currently, to ensure they are fully autonomous agents. Popularized by 123skely's aipool tee experiment: a TEE presale where the community sends funds to an agent, and the agent autonomously issues tokens according to predefined rules.
Marvin Tong's PhalaNetwork: MEV protection, integrating ElizaOS from ai16zdao, and Agent Kira as a verifiable autonomous AI agent.
Fleek's one-click TEE deployment: focused on simplifying usage and improving developer accessibility.
4. FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption)
A form of encryption that allows computations to be performed directly on encrypted data without first decrypting it.
A good case study is mindnetwork.xyz and its proprietary FHE technology/use cases.
Use case - FHE-based Staking Layer and Risk-Free Voting
FHE-based Staking Layer
By using FHE, staked assets remain encrypted, meaning private keys are never exposed, significantly reducing security risks. This ensures privacy while also verifying transactions.
Non-Custodial Voting (MindV)
Governance voting is conducted on encrypted data, ensuring that voting remains private and secure, reducing the risk of coercion or bribery. Users gain voting power (vFHE) by holding high-quality staked assets, thereby decoupling governance from direct asset exposure.
FHE + TEE
By combining TEE and FHE, they create a powerful security layer for AI processing:
·TEE protects operations in the computing environment from external threats.
·FHE ensures that operations are always performed on encrypted data throughout the process.
For institutions processing transactions ranging from $100 million to $10 billion+, privacy and security are crucial to prevent front-running, hacking, or exposure of trading strategies.
For AI agents, this dual encryption enhances privacy and security, making it highly useful in the following areas:
·Sensitive training data privacy
·Protecting internal model weights (to prevent reverse engineering/IP theft)
·User data protection
The main challenge of FHE remains the high overhead due to computational intensity, leading to increased energy consumption and latency. Current research is exploring methods such as hardware acceleration, hybrid encryption techniques, and algorithm optimization to reduce the computational burden and improve efficiency. Therefore, FHE is best suited for low-computation, high-latency applications.
Summary
·FHE = Operate on encrypted data without decryption (strongest privacy protection, but most expensive)
·TEE = Hardware, secure execution in an isolated environment (balancing security and performance)
·ZKP = Prove a statement or authenticate identity without revealing underlying data (suitable for proving facts/credentials)
This is a broad topic, so this is not the end. One key question remains: In an increasingly sophisticated deepfake era, how do we ensure that AI-driven verifiability mechanisms are truly trustworthy? In Part 3, we will delve deeper into:
·The verifiability layer
·The role of AI in verifying data integrity
·The future of privacy and security
Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:
Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Twitter Official Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia
