The bosses are vying with each other again, round 2 already! OKX #Binance, which platform's viewpoint do you guys support? Specifically: 🔥 Star Xu (CEO of OKX) says: Should CEX be held responsible for listing junk Token ? The story began when @intocryptoverse posted a critique of crypto exchanges: "Listing memecoins as junk just to profit from short-term FOMO" It's argued that exchanges will not be respected if they don't respect their users. 🔶 CZ offers his perspective: Why can DEXs list all Token while CEXs can't? 😄 I think exchanges should provide users with access to a diverse range of assets... 👉 Perspective: Users have the right to access, the market decides. 🔷 Star Xu (OKX) strongly refutes: Call CZ's argument a misrepresentation of the fundamental nature of things. ❌ Emphasis: DEX and CEX are completely different. ☑️ DEX: The user retains ownership of their assets. No intermediaries The user is solely responsible. ☑️ CEX: - The platform holds users' money (it's like a bank). - They should be responsible for anti-money laundering, legal compliance, and user protection (this point supports StarXu's boss). - You can't just call yourself an "intermediary, not responsible" and then list everything. According to Star: Equating DEX and CEX to justify listing all Token is a way of avoiding responsibility. In short: 📍From Binance's perspective: The exchange only provides access; users make their own decisions. 📍OKX 'OKX perspective: Having secured users' funds, they have a responsibility to select and protect them. 👇🏻This isn't just about "listing junk Token ," but a battle of opinions regarding the responsibility of Centralized Exchange in the crypto industry. The drama is still incredibly intense, guys! 🔥 What is AE's perspective?