: : [Comment] What will happen to GTE's own consensus protocol if it uses Zero? Author: Steve This structure suggests two things. First, rather than embedding all functions in a single monolithic chain, as was the case in the past, future blockchain designs may increasingly focus on separating areas requiring consensus, areas requiring speed, and areas requiring final settlement. In other words, even networks with independent consensus need not necessarily be a single, all-encompassing L1. Second, the choice of Zero as the funding layer implies that Zero may move beyond a simple L1 to become an infrastructure responsible for final ownership and settlement of global assets—in other words, a role similar to the DTCC of the digital age. While a more definitive assessment will be possible once the actual implementation and regulatory compliance of GTE and Zero are confirmed, this structure at least demonstrates that the era of simply dividing blockchains into L1 and L2 is over. This suggests that an architecture that possesses its own consensus while coexisting with other L1s is entirely possible, suggesting a direction for next-generation financial infrastructure design. 🌎 Full Comment (X / Website) FP Website | Telegram (EN / KR) | X (EN / KR)